High Court grants bail in Customs Act case based on parity with co-accused, upholding constitutional principles.

The High Court of Allahabad granted bail to the applicant in a criminal case under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962, based on parity with a co-accused. The Court, without delving into the case's merits, considered the principles of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the Supreme Court's decision in Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. The bail was subject to conditions including trial cooperation, personal presence, non-tampering with evidence, lawful conduct, and surety verification. Breach of conditions could lead to bail cancellation and remand to prison.

---

---

Issues: Bail application based on parity with co-accused.

Analysis:
The judgment delivered by the High Court of Allahabad pertained to a bail application filed by the applicant, who sought bail on the grounds of parity with a co-accused, citing a previous order granting bail to the co-accused. The applicant had been in jail since a specific date in 2018. The Learned Counsel for the applicant argued for bail based on the similar role of the co-accused and the principle of parity. The Learned A.G.A. opposed the bail but did not contest the facts presented by the applicant's counsel.

The Court, after hearing the arguments from both sides, considered the larger mandate of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and referred to the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. The Court, without delving into the merits of the case, found it to be a fit case for granting bail. Consequently, the Court ordered the release of the applicant on bail in the specific criminal case under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962, subject to certain conditions.

The conditions imposed by the Court for granting bail included the applicant's cooperation with the trial, personal presence on all trial dates, non-tampering with prosecution evidence, refraining from unlawful activities, and not misusing the liberty of bail. Additionally, the Court mandated the verification of the identity, status, and residential proof of the sureties provided by the applicant. The Court reserved the right to cancel the bail and remand the applicant to prison in case of any breach of the imposed conditions.

---