Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demands of service tax, interest and penalties were sustainable in view of the appellants' delay in payment, non-payment of interest, and alleged suppression of facts with intent to evade tax.
Analysis: The appellants had collected service tax but did not deposit it on the due dates, and the payments were made much later, including through cenvat credit, over an extended period. The interest on delayed payment was also not paid before issuance of the show cause notice. On these facts, the finding of suppression and intent to evade was upheld, and the plea that penalty under the statutory provisions was barred because tax and interest had been paid before notice was rejected.
Conclusion: The demand, interest and penalties were sustained and the appellants were not entitled to relief.