Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment orders were vitiated for non-consideration of the objections and denial of personal hearing, and whether the petitioner should be relegated to the statutory appellate remedy.
Analysis: The assessment proceedings arose under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act on a self-assessment/deemed assessment basis, and the impugned revision notices proposed reassessment and penalty. The record showed that the petitioner had filed objections and specifically sought personal hearing, but the assessing authority proceeded to pass the assessment orders without affording such hearing and without considering the objections. In these circumstances, the defect amounted to a violation of the principles of natural justice. The existence of an alternate appeal remedy did not bar writ interference because denial of natural justice is a recognised exception to the rule of alternate remedy. The fresh assessment was also required to be made independently and not merely on the basis of the Enforcement Wing proposal.
Conclusion: The assessment orders were liable to be set aside and the matter was required to be remanded for fresh assessment after granting personal hearing and considering the objections in accordance with law.