Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proviso to section 13 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, was rightly applied to the assessee's branches on the ground that the true profits could not be properly deduced from the books of account because there were no stock tallies and the sales were not recorded with identifiable details.
Analysis: The material finding of the Tribunal was that the accounts suffered from the absence of stock tallies and from sales entries lacking identifiable details as to the quality of goods sold. The question whether such defects prevented the true profits from being deduced from the regular method of accounting was one for the taxing authorities as a question of fact. The court could interfere only if there was no material to support that finding or if the material was irrelevant or incapable of reasonably sustaining the conclusion. On the facts, the absence of stock tallies and the deficient sales records constituted relevant material supporting the view that the profits could not properly be deduced, and the contention that the nature of the business made such records impossible did not displace the Tribunal's finding.
Conclusion: The proviso to section 13 was rightly applied, and the finding against the assessee was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the Revenue, and the challenge to the rejection of the books of account failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Whether income, profits and gains can be properly deduced from the method of accounting regularly employed is a question of fact for the taxing authorities, and their finding will not be disturbed if it is supported by relevant material.