Applicants Denied Input Tax Credit for Pipeline Construction Outside FSRU Factory

The judgment concluded that the applicants are not eligible to avail Input Tax Credit (ITC) on GST paid for goods and services used in constructing the Tie-in pipeline. The Floating Storage Regasification Unit (FSRU) was deemed a factory, and the pipeline laid outside it was excluded under Section 17(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, disallowing ITC for the applicants.

---

---

Issues:
1. Eligibility to avail Input Tax Credit (ITC) on GST paid for goods and services used in constructing the Tie-in pipeline.
2. Definition and interpretation of "factory" in the context of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act).
3. Classification of the Tie-in pipeline as "plant and machinery" under Section 17(5) of the CGST Act.
4. Applicability of the exclusion clause for pipelines laid outside the factory premises.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Eligibility to Avail ITC on GST Paid for Construction of Tie-in Pipeline:
The applicant sought an advance ruling on whether they can avail ITC on GST paid for goods and services used in constructing a Tie-in pipeline for delivering re-gasified LNG from a Floating Storage Regasification Unit (FSRU) to the National Grid. The eligibility for ITC is governed by Sections 16 and 17 of the CGST Act, which outline conditions and restrictions for availing ITC.

2. Definition and Interpretation of "Factory":
The applicant contended that the FSRU is not a factory because it lacks a building, relying on dictionary definitions and a Kerala High Court ruling. They argued that a factory must be a structure over land. However, the ruling referenced the Factories Act, 1948, which defines a factory as any premises where workers are engaged in a manufacturing process. The FSRU, being a place where LNG is re-gasified, qualifies as a factory under this definition. The judgment emphasized that the essence of a factory is the manufacturing process, not the presence of a building.

3. Classification of the Tie-in Pipeline as "Plant and Machinery":
The applicant argued that the Tie-in pipeline should be considered "plant and machinery" as it is embedded in the earth and fitted with various equipment and devices. However, the judgment clarified that Section 17(5) of the CGST Act excludes pipelines laid outside the factory premises from the definition of "plant and machinery." The ruling concluded that the Tie-in pipeline, being outside the FSRU (considered a factory), does not qualify as "plant and machinery" for ITC purposes.

4. Applicability of the Exclusion Clause for Pipelines Laid Outside the Factory Premises:
The judgment focused on the exclusion clause in Section 17(5) of the CGST Act, which states that ITC is not available for pipelines laid outside the factory premises. The applicant's argument that the FSRU is not a factory and thus the pipeline should not be excluded was rejected. The ruling determined that the FSRU is a factory, and the pipeline laid from the FSRU to the National Grid is outside the factory premises, making the exclusion clause applicable.

Conclusion:
The judgment concluded that the applicants are not eligible to avail ITC on GST paid for goods and services used in constructing the Tie-in pipeline. The FSRU qualifies as a factory, and the pipeline laid outside it falls under the exclusion clause of Section 17(5) of the CGST Act, thereby disallowing ITC.

Order:
Question: Whether the applicants are eligible to avail ITC of GST paid on goods and services used for the construction of the Tie-in pipeline for delivery of re-gasified LNG from FSRU to the National GridRs.
Answer: The applicants are not eligible to avail ITC of GST paid on goods and services used for the construction of the Tie-in pipeline for delivery of re-gasified LNG from FSRU to the National Grid.

---