Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the properties inherited by a son from his divided father constituted his separate and individual properties or joint family properties, and whether the income from such properties was assessable in the hands of the Hindu undivided family.
Analysis: The statutory scheme of the Hindu Succession Act was examined in the light of the pre-existing Hindu law. Section 4 gives overriding effect to the Act to the extent of inconsistency with prior Hindu law. Section 8 provides that the property of a male Hindu dying intestate devolves upon the heirs specified in Class I of the Schedule, and the heirs in that class take simultaneously to the exclusion of others. On that footing, when the father's property devolved upon the son, the son alone succeeded to it and the grandson was excluded. The reasoning accepted that the position under uncodified Hindu law, under which property inherited by a son could assume an ancestral character in the hands of the son, no longer applied in this situation because the statutory mode of devolution under section 8 displaced the earlier rule.
Conclusion: The inherited property was the son's separate and individual property, and the income therefrom was not assessable as the income of the Hindu undivided family.