Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in disallowing input tax credit when the assessee had produced tax invoices and maintained the entries in its books of account, and whether such disallowance gave rise to a substantial question of law.
Analysis: The Tribunal had upheld the finding that the evidence of tax payment by the vendors was not forthcoming in respect of the disputed claims. The first appellate authority had already made enquiries by deputing an inspector and by calling for vendor-related material, and had granted relief only to the extent supported by the available evidence. The assessee did not take reasonable steps to secure proof that the vendors had deposited tax into the Government treasury. Input tax credit was treated as a concession and not as an absolute right. The challenge was directed essentially against concurrent factual findings, and no perversity in those findings was shown.
Conclusion: The disallowance of input tax credit was upheld, and the question did not give rise to any substantial question of law.
Ratio Decidendi: A concurrent finding that vendors' tax payment is not established, if not shown to be perverse, cannot be interfered with in appellate jurisdiction, and input tax credit remains a concession dependent on the statutory conditions being satisfied.