Successful Appeal Against Income Tax Penalty for Inaccurate Income Disclosure

The appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for inaccurately disclosing income related to interest on income tax refunds was successful. The court found that the Revenue failed to specify the inaccurate particulars of income, and since Form 26AS marked the interest column as 'not applicable,' penalizing the assessee was deemed inappropriate. Both the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) concluded that the penalty imposition was incorrect, leading to the allowance of the assessee's appeal. Consequently, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was set aside, and the judgment was delivered on 7th June 2019.

---

---

Issues:
Appeal against penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for inaccurate particulars of income related to interest on income tax refunds.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed by the assessee against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for inaccurately disclosing income related to interest on income tax refunds. The assessee, engaged in project financing and asset management, e-filed its income tax return declaring a total income of Rs. 26,00,50,950. The assessment was completed under section 143(3) of the Act, resulting in additions for interest received on income tax refund not offered for tax and disallowance of expenses under section 14A. Subsequently, penalty proceedings were initiated, and a penalty of Rs. 3,53,210 was imposed by the Assessing Officer for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.

The assessee challenged the penalty order before the CIT(A), who dismissed the appeal. The assessee contended that there were no inaccurate particulars furnished regarding interest on income tax refunds, citing Form 26AS issued by the Revenue department where the interest column was marked as 'not applicable.' The argument presented was that since the department did not provide a clear quantification, it was unjustified to penalize the assessee for inaccurate disclosure. The Revenue was required to specify the inaccurate particulars, which was not done in this case.

After hearing both parties and examining the evidence, it was observed that the Revenue failed to identify the specific inaccurate particulars of income filed by the assessee. Since the department itself indicated the interest portion as 'not applicable' in Form 26AS, it was deemed inappropriate to penalize the assessee for inaccurate disclosure. The assessee had offered the refund amount to the tax authorities, further supporting the argument against the penalty. Consequently, the imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deemed incorrect by both the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A), leading to the allowance of the assessee's appeal.

In conclusion, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was set aside. The judgment was pronounced in open court on 7th June 2019.

---