Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the processes of chilling, pasteurization, homogenization and standardization of raw milk into toned milk amounted to manufacture so as to fall outside the scope of business auxiliary service and consequently escape service tax liability.
Analysis: The processes undertaken transformed raw milk into toned milk, which was treated as a marketable product under Chapter Note 6 of Chapter 4. The note operates as a deeming provision where treatment renders the product marketable to consumers. The final product was held to be distinct from the raw material by name, use and characteristics, and the business auxiliary service definition itself excludes activities amounting to manufacture. Since the conversion resulted in a manufactured excisable product, the activity could not be taxed as business auxiliary service. The plea on limitation was not examined because the appeal succeeded on merits.
Conclusion: The activity amounted to manufacture and not business auxiliary service; the service tax demand and penalties could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where processing of goods results in a marketable and commercially distinct product and is treated as manufacture by the applicable deeming provision, the activity falls outside the ambit of business auxiliary service.