Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether excess service tax paid by an assessee could be adjusted against service tax liability in any subsequent month or quarter, and whether such adjustment was confined only to the immediately succeeding period under Rule 6(4A) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994.
Analysis: Rule 6(4A) permits an assessee who has paid excess service tax to adjust the excess amount against service tax liability for succeeding months or quarter, as the case may be. The substitution of the rule by Notification No. 1/2007-ST dated 01.03.2007 was relied upon to hold that the rule does not impose a restriction limiting adjustment only to the immediately subsequent month. The earlier objection based on a narrow reading of the rule was found inconsistent with the statutory scheme, and the adjustment already made by the assessee was held to be permissible.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to adjust excess service tax paid in a subsequent month or quarter, and the departmental objection to such adjustment was unsustainable.