Court allows assessments in deceased person's name, deems curable infirmity under Income-tax Act Section 159

The Court held that Assessment Orders issued in the name of a deceased person were not void but a curable infirmity. It directed assessments to be made in the names of legal representatives under Section 159 of the Income-tax Act. The Court upheld the remand for fresh assessments in the name of the legal representative, Mr. V. Srinivasan, emphasizing compliance with procedural requirements and informing the Authority of relevant facts. The Appeals were dismissed, ruling in favor of the Revenue.

---

---

Issues:
1. Assessment Orders passed in the name of a deceased person - validity and legal implications.
2. Applicability of Section 159 of the Income-tax Act regarding legal representatives in assessment proceedings.

Issue 1: Assessment Orders passed in the name of a deceased person

The Appellant argued that Assessment Orders passed in the name of a deceased person were non-est and void, as in this case where S.Vellamuthusamy Naidu had expired before the Orders were issued. The CIT (Appeals) agreed, stating that orders issued in the name of a deceased person are null and void, and should have followed Section 159 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal, however, found the passing of the order against a dead person as a curable infirmity and directed the Assessing Authority to make assessments in the names of legal representatives. The Tribunal considered the time limit for passing the order and set aside the previous orders, allowing the Revenue's appeal.

Issue 2: Applicability of Section 159 of the Income-tax Act

Section 159 of the Act holds legal representatives liable for paying any sum the deceased would have been liable to pay. It states that proceedings against the deceased are deemed to continue against the legal representative, and the legal representative is deemed to be an assessee. The Revenue argued that the legal representative, being aware of the death of the Assessee, should have informed the Assessing Authority before the Assessment Orders were passed. The Court found that the legal representative failed to inform the Authority of the Assessee's death before the Orders were issued. Therefore, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to remand the case back to the Assessing Authority for fresh assessments in the name of the legal representative, Mr. V. Srinivasan.

In conclusion, the Court dismissed the Appeals and answered the questions against the Assessee in favor of the Revenue. The Court emphasized the importance of complying with procedural requirements and bringing relevant facts to the notice of the Assessing Authority to ensure proper assessment proceedings.

---