High Court Adjusts Stay Order, Balances Revenue & Assessee Interests

The High Court modified the Tribunal's interim stay order to ensure a balanced approach, safeguarding both the Revenue's interest and providing relief to the assessee. Emphasizing consistency in judicial orders, the High Court clarified that the stay application should focus on the royalty issue, not the entire tax liability. The Court adjusted the payment schedule, directing the assessee to pay Rs. 400 crores by 31.03.2019 and the remaining Rs. 75 crores in two installments by 31.05.2019.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Consistency in the Tribunal's orders with the High Court's previous orders.
2. Consideration of the entire tax liability versus specific issues (royalty, transfer pricing, and attribution) in the stay application.
3. Adequacy of the interim order by the Tribunal in safeguarding the interest of the Revenue.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Consistency in the Tribunal's Orders:
The primary contention of the Revenue is that the Tribunal's order should align with the High Court's previous orders. The High Court emphasized the necessity of maintaining consistency in judicial orders. The Tribunal's interim stay order was deemed inconsistent with the High Court's order dated 28th August 2018, which had specific directions regarding the recovery of tax, interest, and penalty. The High Court had previously directed that approximately 90% of the tax and interest part of the demand had been paid by the assessee, and the remaining balance recovery should be stayed, safeguarding the Revenue's interest with a Bank Guarantee.

2. Consideration of Entire Tax Liability:
The Revenue argued that the Tribunal should consider the entire tax liability, including issues of royalty, transfer pricing, and attribution, while disposing of the stay application. However, the High Court noted that the Tribunal's focus was primarily on the royalty issue, as substantiated by the Revenue's own pleadings. The High Court found that the demand related to transfer pricing and attribution was set aside by the Tribunal and remanded to the TPO for fresh consideration. Therefore, the High Court concluded that only the demand related to the royalty issue should be considered in the stay application, not the entire tax liability.

3. Adequacy of the Interim Order by the Tribunal:
The High Court examined whether the Tribunal's interim order adequately protected the Revenue's interest. The Tribunal had directed the assessee to pay Rs. 350 crores by 31.3.2019 and additional installments totaling Rs. 125 crores by 30.6.2019. The High Court found no arbitrariness or perversity in the Tribunal's quantification of Rs. 475 crores as a condition for granting the stay. However, the High Court modified the payment schedule to balance the equities, directing the assessee to pay Rs. 400 crores by 31.03.2019 and the remaining Rs. 75 crores in two installments by 31.05.2019.

Conclusion:
The High Court disposed of the writ petitions by modifying the Tribunal's order to ensure a balanced approach, safeguarding both the Revenue's interest and providing relief to the assessee. The High Court emphasized the need for consistency in judicial orders and clarified that the stay application should focus on the royalty issue, not the entire tax liability. The Tribunal's interim order was modified to direct the assessee to pay Rs. 400 crores by 31.03.2019 and the remaining Rs. 75 crores in two installments by 31.05.2019.

---