TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal overturns demand order, emphasizing thorough scrutiny and fair decisions</h1> <h3>M/s Castex Technologies Ltd. Versus CGST C & CE- Alwar</h3> M/s Castex Technologies Ltd. Versus CGST C & CE- Alwar - TMI Issues:- Appeal against demand confirmed under Notification No. 67/95 of Central Excise for manufacturing Toolings.- Dispute regarding the appellant's manufacturing of Tooling during the impugned period.- Allegation of the Adjudicating Authority passing orders without proper application of mind.- Failure of the authorities below to examine the facts of the case judiciously.Analysis:The appellant appealed against the demand confirmed under Notification No. 67/95 of Central Excise, arguing that they did not manufacture Tooling during the impugned period. The Revenue contended that the appellant raised invoices for Tooling, indicating captive usage, thus disqualifying them from the benefit of the notification. The Adjudicating Authority's order was challenged for factual inaccuracies, emphasizing that the appellant did not manufacture Tooling during the period in question, as evidenced by the purchase of Tooling invoices from another entity. The Tribunal noted the Adjudicating Authority's failure to apply proper scrutiny and accused them of mechanical decision-making without due consideration, cautioning against such practices in the future. Similarly, the Commissioner (Appeal) was criticized for not examining the case facts judiciously. Ultimately, upon establishing that the appellant was not the manufacturer of the Tooling in question, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant and granting consequential benefits.This judgment highlights the importance of thorough examination and judicial application of mind by adjudicating authorities to ensure fair and accurate decisions. It underscores the necessity for a meticulous review of facts and legal provisions before passing orders, warning against routine or mechanical decision-making processes. The case serves as a reminder of the significance of upholding procedural integrity and ensuring that judgments are based on a comprehensive understanding of the case specifics and relevant legal frameworks.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
