TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the search assessments under section 153A could be sustained in the absence of incriminating material and where the regular assessments had not abated, and whether the related additions required fresh adjudication; (ii) Whether assessment proceedings initiated against a company after its conversion into an LLP were valid when the proceedings were framed against a non-existent entity.
Issue (i): Whether the search assessments under section 153A could be sustained in the absence of incriminating material and where the regular assessments had not abated, and whether the related additions required fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The parties accepted that the legal findings of the first appellate authority on the search-related objections could not be sustained in view of the existence of incriminating material and the fact that the relevant assessments had not abated. Since the merits of the additions relating to share application money or premium, unexplained investment, and disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D had not been examined by the first appellate authority, the proper course was to restore those issues to the Assessing Officer for de novo consideration after granting adequate opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication of the additions on merits.
Issue (ii): Whether assessment proceedings initiated against a company after its conversion into an LLP were valid when the proceedings were framed against a non-existent entity.
Analysis: The conversion of the assessee into an LLP had taken place before initiation of the section 153A proceedings, and the fact of conversion was not disputed. A legal objection going to the root of jurisdiction was therefore entertained. Applying the settled principle that proceedings against a non-existent entity are unsustainable, the Tribunal held that the impugned assessments could not stand. It also clarified that the Assessing Officer would remain free to proceed against the successor LLP in accordance with law under section 170.
Conclusion: The proceedings against the converted company were invalid and the Revenue's appeals were dismissed on this issue.
Final Conclusion: The first set of matters was restored for fresh examination of the additions, while the second set failed because the assessment had been framed against a non-existent entity after conversion into an LLP.
Ratio Decidendi: Proceedings initiated against a non-existent entity are void, and search-related additions under section 153A not examined on merits by the appellate authority may be remanded for fresh adjudication by the Assessing Officer.
TaxTMI 
