1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal Processing Ordered as Revenue Fails to Prove Order Service</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD directed the Registry to process an appeal as the Revenue failed to provide proof of serving the impugned order to ... Service of notice - medium of service - section 37C(1)(a) of Central Excise Act, 1944 - HELD THAT:- Revenue could not produce any acknowledgement obtained by Revenue from the appellant of having served on appellant impugned order any time before 19-8-2018. Registry is directed to process the appeal for assigning appeal number and take further action for further processing. After completing the processing, registry may list the matter at the earliest before the Division Bench. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD directed the Registry to process an appeal due to Revenue failing to provide proof of serving the impugned order to the appellant as required by law. The matter will be listed before the Division Bench after processing. (2019 (5) TMI 1022 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD)