Appellate Authority Upholds WBAAR Ruling on Input Tax Credit for Lease Rent Pre-Operative Period

The Appellate Authority upheld the ruling of the WBAAR, concluding that Input Tax Credit (ITC) on lease rent paid during the pre-operative period is not available. The lease rent was found to have a direct nexus with the construction of the resort, falling under the blocked credits as per Section 17(5)(d) of the GST Act. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the WBAAR's decision was affirmed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Eligibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on lease rent paid during the pre-operative period.
2. Interpretation of Section 17(5)(d) of the GST Act concerning blocked credits.
3. Nexus between lease rent and construction of immovable property.
4. Classification of lease rental as a service or capital goods.
5. Proportionate credit of lease rental on unconstructed area.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Eligibility of ITC on Lease Rent Paid During the Pre-operative Period:
The appellant sought an advance ruling on whether ITC is available on input tax paid on lease rent during the pre-operative period for leasehold land used for furtherance of business, when capitalized and treated as capital expenditure. The WBAAR ruled that ITC is not available for lease rent paid during the pre-operative period when capitalized as capital expenditure.

2. Interpretation of Section 17(5)(d) of the GST Act:
The appellant argued that the WBAAR erroneously interpreted Section 17(5)(d), which blocks ITC on goods or services received for the construction of immovable property, except plant and machinery. The appellant contended that lease rent is paid to acquire rights to the land and is not used for construction of immovable property. However, the WBAAR held that the prohibition under Section 17(5)(d) extends to immovable property in general, including lease rent essential for construction.

3. Nexus Between Lease Rent and Construction of Immovable Property:
The appellant argued that there is no direct nexus between lease rent and construction, emphasizing that lease rent would be capitalized under "Leasehold Land" and not "Building Block." The WBAAR, however, found that there is a direct nexus between lease rent and construction, as the lease rent enables the appellant to undertake construction activities.

4. Classification of Lease Rental as a Service or Capital Goods:
The appellant contended that lease rental is a service and not capital goods, and thus, Section 16(3) of the GST Act is not applicable. The WBAAR did not classify lease rental as capital goods but maintained that ITC on lease rental paid during the pre-operative period is blocked under Section 17(5)(d).

5. Proportionate Credit of Lease Rental on Unconstructed Area:
The appellant argued that the lease rent should be proportionately credited for the unconstructed area, which would be used for auxiliary services. The WBAAR rejected this argument, stating that the entire lease rental is part of the project cost for constructing the Eco Resort, and thus, ITC on lease rental is blocked.

Conclusion:
The Appellate Authority upheld the ruling of the WBAAR, concluding that ITC on lease rent paid during the pre-operative period is not available. The lease rent has a direct nexus with the construction of the resort, and thus, falls under the blocked credits as per Section 17(5)(d) of the GST Act. The appeal was dismissed, and the ruling of the WBAAR was affirmed.

---