Court Orders Verification of TDS Certificates for Blocked ITC Recovery

The court directed the Assessing Officer to verify the genuineness of Form-501 TDS certificates in the revised return. If authentic, the petitioner would receive the blocked Input Tax Credit (ITC). The assessment process was to be completed within a month, resolving the longstanding issue. This decision aimed to address the petitioner's concerns efficiently, leading to the closure of related matters and ensuring timely resolution.

---

---

Issues: Challenge to blocking of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by respondents.

Analysis:
The petitioner challenged the action of the respondents in blocking the ITC to which they were entitled. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking relief. The court heard arguments from both parties, with Mr. Jakkula Sridhar representing the petitioner and the Government Pleader for Commercial Tax representing the respondents. The court noted that the petitioner had claimed Transitional Relief (TGST) amounting to Rs. 1,88,13,191, but the ITC was not carried forward in the return filed in June 2017. Subsequently, the dealer filed TRAN-1 to claim the amount, which represented TDS covered by Form No.501. The respondents contended that assessments were pending from 01-05-2013, and the blockage of ITC was partly due to the petitioner's failure to make a claim in the return for June 2017. However, the dealer later filed a revised return in October 2017. The court observed that the problem could have been resolved if the assessment had been completed or at least looked into after the revised return was filed. Consequently, the court issued directions to address the issue.

The court directed the Assessing Officer to scrutinize the revised return to verify the genuineness of the Form-501 TDS certificates. If found genuine, the petitioner was entitled to the ITC, which could then be released. The Assessing Officer was instructed to complete this exercise within two weeks. Additionally, the court mandated the completion of the assessment process, following due process of law, within a month, considering the matter was already a year old. The court's directives aimed to resolve the petitioner's concerns regarding the blocked ITC and pending assessments. As a result of these directions, any miscellaneous petitions pending were to be closed. The judgment provided a structured approach to address the issues raised by the petitioner concerning the blocking of ITC and the pending assessments, ensuring a timely resolution and closure of related matters.

---