Cartridge import entitlement by bore and function, not brand name, defeats misdeclaration, confiscation and penalty.

Import entitlement for cartridges under Para 2.34 of the Handbook of Procedures, 2002-2007 was treated as turning on bore and functional capability, not on a specific brand name. DGFT clarification, supported by Ministry of Home Affairs and BPR&D material, was accepted as showing that the imported .22 LR Stinger and 7.62 x 25 Tokarev cartridges fell within the permitted categories because they could be chambered and fired from the specified bores. On that basis, the description was not a legally sustainable misdeclaration, and confiscation and personal penalty were held unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and consequential relief followed.

---

---

Issues: Whether cartridges imported by a licensed arms dealer, though described with different brand names, were covered by the import entitlement in Para 2.34 of the Handbook of Procedures, 2002-2007; and whether confiscation and personal penalty were justified on the alleged misdeclaration.

Analysis: The import entitlement under Para 2.34 was treated as referring to cartridges that can be chambered and fired from the specified bores, and not as restricting import only to a particular brand name. The clarifications issued by the DGFT, supported by the Ministry of Home Affairs and BPR&D material, were accepted as showing that the imported .22 LR Stinger and 7.62 x 25 Tokarev cartridges fell within the permitted categories because they matched the relevant bore and functional specifications. On that basis, the declared description was held not to amount to a legally sustainable misdeclaration, since brand nomenclature was not the governing test where the policy requirements were otherwise satisfied.

Conclusion: The imported cartridges were held to be covered by the licence and the policy, and the confiscation and penalty were unsustainable.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an import policy permits cartridges by specified bore and functional capability, DGFT clarification on the scope of the entitlement is binding on customs authorities, and brand-name variation alone does not justify confiscation or penalty if the goods otherwise conform to the licensed description.

---