Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for finalisation of assessment of liquid bulk cargo under customs law, duty is to be computed on the quantity shown in the bill of lading or on the quantity actually received in the shore tank.
Analysis: The operative legal position applied was that customs duty is chargeable on imported goods only when import is complete, the taxable event is import, and valuation must correspond to the time and place of importation. Goods lost, pilfered, or destroyed before completion of import do not attract duty on the lost quantity. The earlier circular treating load-port quantity as determinative was inconsistent with this statutory scheme, and the same principle governs both specific-rate and ad valorem duty. The quantity relevant for assessment is therefore the quantity actually received in India, as reflected by shore tank receipt.
Conclusion: Duty was required to be reassessed on the shore tank quantity and not on the bill of lading quantity; the contrary assessment could not stand.