TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Orders Respondent to Decide on Service Tax Objections Promptly</h1> <h3>Thiagarajar College of Engineering Versus Joint Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner of Central Excise</h3> Thiagarajar College of Engineering Versus Joint Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner of Central Excise - TMI Issues:Challenge to Show Cause Notice under Finance Act, 1994 for service tax on internet and skill development fee by educational institution.Analysis:The petitioner, an educational institution, challenged a Show Cause Notice issued by the respondent under the Finance Act, 1994, demanding service tax for fees collected for internet and skill development. The petitioner contended that as an educational institution, they are exempt from the Finance Act, 1994 under Section 66D(l) which includes education up to higher secondary school or equivalent and approved vocational education courses. The petitioner argued that all their courses are recognized, and the fee collected as annual fee covers various components, including internet fee and skill development fee. The petitioner claimed that the impugned notice was issued without authority under law and filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging it.The respondent, through the Standing Counsel, contended that the petitioner had only challenged the Show Cause Notice and no final orders had been passed. The respondent argued that the objections raised by the petitioner could be raised before the concerned authority. The Court noted the provisions of law cited by the petitioner and the fee fixation order, concluding that the respondent must adjudicate and pass final orders after considering the objections raised in the writ petition.The objections raised by the petitioner included being outside the purview of the Finance Act, 1994 under Section 66D(l), conducting recognized courses, and the fee fixation order specifying the total annual fee without service tax. The Court emphasized that a Show Cause Notice can be challenged under Article 226 only if issued without authority under law. While the respondent claimed the notice was issued in accordance with the law, the Court directed the respondent to pass final orders within 12 weeks, considering all objections raised by the petitioner. The Court disposed of the Writ Petition with no costs, closing the connected miscellaneous petition.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
