Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 was liable to be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration on account of the notice having been sent to the previous address and the petitioner not having been afforded an effective opportunity of reply and hearing.
Analysis: The petitioner complained that the show cause notice was sent to the old address and that a reply could not be filed. The Court noted that Form VAT 112 had not been filed and, therefore, the Assessing Officer was justified in using the address available in the records. At the same time, the Court found that the turnover claimed as exempt under the Telangana Value Added Tax Act, 2005 had been treated as stock transfer and taxed under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. In the interest of fairness, and since the respondents were not at fault, the Court granted one further opportunity to the petitioner after directing deposit of Rs. 3,00,000/-, which had been complied with.
Conclusion: The assessment order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for consideration afresh after receipt of the petitioner's reply and grant of personal hearing.