Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on a scheme of amalgamation involving transfer of no immovable property in West Bengal, the stamp duty payable under Article 23A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 was to be computed at the rate applicable under Article 23 as a conveyance or at the rate specifically prescribed in Article 23A.
Analysis: Article 23A specifically governs conveyance in respect of amalgamation, merger, reconstruction, or demerger and creates a self-contained scheme for computation of duty. The opening reference to conveyance does not displace the specific percentages and limiting conditions set out in sub-clauses (a) and (b). The expression "whichever is higher" operates only within the two alternatives in the relevant sub-clause and cannot be extended to import the highest rate under Article 23 for every case. Such an interpretation would render the carefully structured rates in Article 23A redundant and otiose. Since the transferor company had no immovable property in West Bengal, the applicable basis was the aggregate consideration paid by the transferee company, and duty had to be computed at the rate specifically provided under Article 23A.
Conclusion: The impugned demand based on 6% under Article 23 was unsustainable; the correct stamp duty was half per cent on the value paid by the transferee company, and the writ petition succeeded.