Registration suspension must rest on statutory defaults alone; non-payment of Entry tax could not justify denial of Form C declarations.

Section 27(5A) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 permits suspension of a dealer's registration certificate only for the specific defaults enumerated in that provision. Non-payment of Entry tax did not fall within the Act's definition of "tax" under section 2(27), so suspension founded on that default was without jurisdiction. The Court also noted that the suspension operated retrospectively and prevented generation of Form C declarations under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The impugned suspension was therefore quashed, and the registration certificates were directed to be restored with permission to generate Form C declarations for the relevant period.

---

---

Issues: Whether the suspension of the dealer's registration certificate under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 for non-payment of Entry tax was within the scope of section 27(5A), and whether the registration was liable to be restored with consequential permission to generate Form C declarations under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

Analysis: Section 27(5A) authorises suspension of registration only where the statutory defaults specified in clauses (a) to (e) exist, including failure to pay tax under section 30 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The Court held that Entry tax dues do not fall within the expression "tax" as defined in section 2(27) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Since the impugned suspension was founded on non-payment of Entry tax and not on any default covered by section 27(5A), the exercise of power was without jurisdiction. The Court further noted that the suspension had been given retrospective effect and that, because the registration was not restored after the suspension period, the dealer was prevented from generating Form C declarations under section 8(4) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

Conclusion: The suspension order was illegal and without jurisdiction, and the respondents were required to restore the registration certificates and permit generation of Form C declarations for the relevant period.

Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded, the impugned suspension was quashed, and consequential restoration and Form C relief was granted to the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: A registration certificate under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 can be suspended only for the defaults expressly enumerated in section 27(5A), and not for non-payment of a levy that does not answer the statutory definition of tax under that Act.

---