Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether denial of CENVAT credit on air travel agent and tour operator services, life insurance/general insurance services and rent-a-cab services required re-adjudication on account of unconsidered documentary evidence linking the services to output services.
Analysis: The appellant produced invoices and supporting ledger entries showing travel undertaken by employees for client-related work and for official purposes connected with market research services. The documentary material indicated that the services were used in the course of providing output services and had not been properly examined by the authorities below. Since the relevant documents were not adequately appreciated at the original and appellate stages, a fresh adjudication was necessary.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for re-adjudication, with direction to the appellant to produce the necessary documents.