Managing agency compensation: capital receipt in nature, yet taxable as deemed business income and assessable on accrual basis.

Compensation received for termination of a managing agency was treated as capital in nature because the managing agency formed part of the assessee's income-earning apparatus and its loss destroyed that source of income. However, the same receipt was taxable as deemed business income under the statutory fiction in section 28(ii), which applies to compensation connected with termination or modification of a managing agency regardless of the source of payment. The amount was also not wholly assessable in assessment year 1963-64 on a receipt basis, because under the mercantile system the relevant income accrued year by year and had to be attributed to the periods of accrual.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the amount of Rs. 93,515 received under the award was a capital receipt or a revenue receipt. (ii) Whether the amount, though capital in nature, was taxable as profits and gains under section 28(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (iii) Whether the entire amount was assessable in the assessment year 1963-64 notwithstanding the assessee's mercantile system of accounting.

Issue (i): Whether the amount of Rs. 93,515 received under the award was a capital receipt or a revenue receipt.

Analysis: Compensation for loss of managing agency is to be distinguished from compensation for non-performance of an ordinary trading contract. Where the managing agency forms the very business apparatus of the assessee and its termination destroys that source of income, the payment received for such loss is capital in character. The amount awarded represented compensation for loss of the managing agency commission and not a receipt arising in the ordinary course of trading operations.

Conclusion: The amount was a capital receipt and not a revenue receipt; this issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the amount, though capital in nature, was taxable as profits and gains under section 28(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The statutory fiction in section 10(5A) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 and section 28(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 treats compensation received by a managing agent for termination or modification of the managing agency as profits and gains of business. The source of payment is immaterial so long as the amount is received in connection with the termination of the managing agency. The award was compensation for loss of managing agency commission and therefore fell within the deeming provision.

Conclusion: The amount was chargeable to tax as deemed business income under section 28(ii); this issue was decided in favour of the revenue.

Issue (iii): Whether the entire amount was assessable in the assessment year 1963-64 notwithstanding the assessee's mercantile system of accounting.

Analysis: Under the mercantile system, income is brought to tax when it accrues, not merely when it is received. The award quantified compensation by reference to the commission that had accrued year by year during the relevant periods, and the assessee's right to such remuneration arose during those years. The amount was therefore attributable to the years of accrual and could not be entirely fastened to the year of receipt.

Conclusion: The entire amount was not assessable in the assessment year 1963-64; this issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by holding that the receipt was capital in nature, but still taxable as deemed business income under the relevant statutory fiction, while assessment on a pure receipt basis for the entire sum in 1963-64 was rejected in view of accrual principles.

Ratio Decidendi: Compensation received by a managing agent for termination of the managing agency is capital in nature, but where a deeming provision applies, it is taxable as business income; under the mercantile system, such income is assessable in the years in which it accrues.

---