Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the final order required rectification to confine the exemption period to 27.02.2010, to correct the transitional period between the two notifications, and to delete the erroneous reference to penalty under Section 78.
Analysis: The applications were taken up as rectification proceedings and the record was examined to identify obvious mistakes in the earlier final order. The exemption, as affected by Notification No. 03/2010-ST dated 27.02.2010, ceased on 27.02.2010, and the transitional period between Notification No. 09/2003-ST dated 20.06.2003 and Notification No. 24/2004-ST dated 10.09.2004 also required correction in the operative portion. The reference to Section 78 in the penalty discussion was found to be inadvertent and was corrected as a typographical error.
Conclusion: The rectification applications were allowed to the extent of correcting the dates, the exemption period, and the erroneous penalty reference.