Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to 75% abatement on freight charges on production of a general declaration and whether penalty could be sustained in view of the nature of the dispute.
Analysis: The application was treated as one seeking clarification/rectification of the earlier final order. The demand was confined to the tax liability relatable to 25% of the freight charges, while 75% abatement was directed to be extended on the basis of the general declaration. As the dispute turned on interpretation, the request for penalty was not accepted.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to 75% abatement on freight charges, the tax liability on the remaining 25% was maintained with interest, and no penalty was imposed.