1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Applications for rectification dismissed in Final Order No. A/30823-30824/2018.</h1> The Tribunal upheld the decision and dismissed the applications for rectification of mistake in Final Order No. A/30823-30824/2018 dated 03.08.2018. ... Rectification of Mistake - error apparent on the face of record or not? - HELD THAT:- In paragraph No. 10 the bench has given a reasoning to come to a conclusion that CENVAT credit of ₹ 2,26,303/- is denied to the appellant - there is no error, leave alone an error apparent on the face of the record. Applications for rectification of mistake are dismissed. The appellant filed applications seeking rectification of error in Final Order No. A/30823-30824/2018 dated 03.08.2018. The Tribunal found no error in paragraph No. 10 and dismissed the applications for rectification of mistake. (Judgement: Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD, 2019 (5) TMI 46 - CESTAT HYDERABAD)
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
