TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal upholds CIT(A)'s decision on deduction u/s 10AA, criticizes AO's arbitrary actions.</h1> <h3>Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-3 (1) Visakhapatnam Versus M/s Minimet Refractory Solutions Pvt. Ltd. And (Vice-Versa)</h3> Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-3 (1) Visakhapatnam Versus M/s Minimet Refractory Solutions Pvt. Ltd. And (Vice-Versa) - TMI Issues:- Deduction u/s 10AA- Reopening of assessment u/s 147Deduction u/s 10AA:The case involved the deduction u/s 10AA and reopening of assessment u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee, engaged in the manufacture and export of chrome concentrate, initially filed its return of income for A.Y. 2009-10, revising it later. The AO reopened the assessment due to a claimed exemption u/s 10AA. The AO computed the deduction proportionately to the export turnover, restricting it to &8377; 2,07,74,719. The CIT(A) held that the notice u/s 148 was invalid as the assessee had furnished all details during the original assessment. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that the AO failed to establish any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material facts.Reopening of Assessment u/s 147:The AO reopened the assessment u/s 147 beyond four years, alleging the assessee did not maintain separate books of accounts for the SEZ unit as required u/s 10AA. However, the assessee had provided all relevant details during the original assessment. The Tribunal found that the AO wrongly invoked jurisdiction as there was no failure to disclose material facts. On merits, the AO made disallowances without examining the books of accounts. The Tribunal held that the assessee maintained separate accounts and was entitled to the deduction u/s 10AA. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, and the cross objections of the assessee were deemed infructuous.In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the revenue's appeal and confirming the assessee's entitlement to the deduction u/s 10AA. The Tribunal found that the AO incorrectly reopened the assessment and made arbitrary disallowances without proper examination of the books of accounts. The assessee's compliance with disclosure requirements and maintenance of separate accounts were crucial factors in the judgment.
TaxTMI 