Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the best judgment assessment made under section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the appellate order confirming it should be set aside and the matter restored for fresh consideration in view of the assessee's inability to produce material before the assessing authority.
Analysis: The assessment was completed ex parte after notices issued during assessment proceedings did not elicit compliance, and the addition related to cash deposits in the bank account. Before the Tribunal, the assessee produced medical material and supporting documents and stated that the relevant evidence could be substantiated by the legal heir. In these circumstances, the dispute turned on whether the material should be examined afresh by the assessing authority after granting an effective opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The matter was remitted to the assessing authority for de novo adjudication with a direction to consider the evidence filed and afford adequate opportunity to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where material relevant to a best judgment assessment was not examined because of the assessee's inability to comply and a plausible cause for non-compliance is shown, the assessment can be restored for fresh consideration after giving an effective opportunity of hearing.