Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount shown as provision for labour retiring gratuity was a reserve eligible for inclusion in the capital computation under the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964.
Analysis: The amount was required to be tested against the exclusionary Explanation introduced to rule 1 of the Second Schedule. The Explanation excludes amounts standing to the credit of specified items under reserves and surplus and current liabilities in the prescribed balance-sheet form. The item in question did not fall within the listed items under reserves and surplus, and the Court held that the provisions shown under the balance-sheet heading "Current liabilities and provisions" were not automatically excluded merely because they were described as provisions. The amount was also not one capable of being treated as a contingent liability as it could not be ascertained with substantial accuracy. On the proper construction of the statutory scheme, the item retained the character of a reserve.
Conclusion: The amount was a reserve and was includible in the capital computation under the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964.
Ratio Decidendi: For purposes of capital computation under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, an amount is not excluded from reserve merely because it is described as a provision in the balance-sheet unless it falls within the specific statutory exclusions or represents a truly ascertained contingent liability.