Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether SAD paid at the time of de-bonding of a 100% EOU was eligible for CENVAT credit, and whether the exemption under Notification No. 23/03-CE dated 31.03.2003 could be invoked to deny such credit.
Analysis: The appellant had paid Special Additional Duty on imported goods at the time of de-bonding without availing any exemption under Notification No. 19/06-Cus dated 01.03.2006. On that basis alone, the duty paid was creditable. In any event, the cited exemption notification was held to be inapplicable to goods cleared on de-bonding, so the department's premise that the goods were exempt and therefore no credit was available could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to CENVAT credit of the SAD paid on de-bonding, and the demand based on the alleged availability of exemption failed.
Final Conclusion: The demand was set aside and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where SAD is paid on de-bonding of a 100% EOU without availing exemption, and the relied-upon exemption notification is inapplicable to de-bonding, CENVAT credit cannot be denied on the footing that the goods were exempt.