Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order passed under section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 was liable to be quashed for want of adequate opportunity and violation of principles of natural justice.
Analysis: The pre-revision notice disclosed the names of some other end sellers, but the request for return copies and connected records was not considered. The second pre-revision notice also did not furnish break-up details of the alleged suppressed purchases. The impugned assessment order did not record reasons for rejecting the request for relevant particulars. In the circumstances, the petitioner was not afforded a fair and effective opportunity before the assessment was finalised.
Conclusion: The assessment order was quashed and the matter was remitted for fresh pre-revision notice and fresh consideration after giving sufficient opportunity, including personal hearing.