TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal upholds penalty order against assessee for assessment year 2009-10 under Income Tax Act</h1> <h3>Makhan Singh Mukh Sewadar Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (1), Amritsar</h3> Makhan Singh Mukh Sewadar Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (1), Amritsar - TMI Issues:1. Whether the impugned penalty order is barred by time and non-est in law.Analysis:1. The appeal arose from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)'s order dismissing the assessee's appeal contesting the penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for A.Y. 2009-10.2. The main issue was whether the penalty order was time-barred. The assessee argued that the penalty order was barred by time under section 275(1)(c), while the Revenue contended it was covered under section 275(1)(a), making the penalty within time.3. The Tribunal examined the provisions of section 275, which set the time limitation for penalties under Chapter XXI of the Act. The exclusion of the period of adjudication under the appellate procedure aims to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and ensure firm findings of fact for penalty proceedings.4. The assessee claimed that the failure to obtain and furnish the audit report under section 44AB was independent of the quantum proceedings. However, the Tribunal found that the turnover dispute in the quantum proceedings directly affected the obligation to get accounts audited and levy of penalty under section 271B.5. The Tribunal held that the impugned penalty order was not barred by time. The turnover/gross receipt in question was determined to be of the assessee in the appellate proceedings, supporting the levy of penalty. The appeal was dismissed accordingly.6. The decision was pronounced on February 27, 2019, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the Revenue and upholding the penalty order against the assessee.This detailed analysis of the legal judgment highlights the key issues, arguments presented by both parties, relevant legal provisions, and the Tribunal's decision, providing a comprehensive understanding of the case.
TaxTMI 