Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, there was no occasion to impose additional super-tax under section 23A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: Proceedings under section 23A require the income-tax authority first to determine whether the dividend distributed is less than the statutory percentage calculated with reference to the total income reduced by tax payable thereon. If that threshold is not met, the further question is whether the dividend declared was nonetheless reasonable having regard to prior losses, smallness of profits, and the overall financial position of the company judged by business considerations. On the facts, the statutory percentage was not distributed on the basis required by section 23A, and the Tribunal erred in treating 50% of commercial profits as sufficient. At the same time, no enquiry had been made into whether the dividend was unreasonable or too low in the light of the company's financial position.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the negative and against the assessee. The Tribunal's view that no additional super-tax could arise merely because 50% of commercial profits had been distributed was incorrect.