TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether inter-segment charges raised by one division of a telecom undertaking on its own landline division constituted taxable Interconnection Usage Charges and attracted service tax, interest and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994.
Analysis: The relevant taxing entry covered services provided by a telegraph authority to any person in relation to telecommunication service. The statutory and regulatory material, including the TRAI framework and the CBEC clarification, showed that interconnection usage charges are charges payable by one service provider to another service provider for network usage, termination or transit of calls. On the facts, the charges in dispute were raised by one division of the same corporate entity on another division of the same entity. Such a transaction was only an internal financial adjustment and not a service rendered to another person. The absence of two distinct service provider and service receiver entities meant that the essential ingredient of a taxable service was not satisfied. The reasoning also aligned with the principle that service tax cannot be levied on service rendered to oneself.
Conclusion: The inter-segment charges were not taxable Interconnection Usage Charges and the demand, together with interest and penalties, could not survive.
TaxTMI 
