Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the classification of tablet computers under Entry No. 45 of Schedule II to the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 required consideration in light of the adopted tariff classification under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and whether interim protection was warranted pending hearing.
Analysis: The petitioner's case was founded on the statutory rate entry for information technology products, the corresponding tariff description in Chapter 84 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and the CBEC circular treating tablet computers as classifiable under heading 8471 30. The challenge also pointed to the absence of reasons in the assessment order for rejecting that classification. In view of those contentions, notice was directed and interim protection was considered appropriate.
Outcome: Notice issued returnable on the specified date and the respondents were restrained from taking coercive action pursuant to the assessment order during the interim period.