Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether Cenvat credit of education cess and higher education cess earned prior to 01.03.2015 could be utilized for payment of duty. (ii) Whether penalty was leviable for such utilization.
Issue (i): Whether Cenvat credit of education cess and higher education cess earned prior to 01.03.2015 could be utilized for payment of duty.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier decisions holding that education cess and higher education cess credit earned prior to 01.03.2015 could not be used for payment of duty. On that basis, the challenge to the duty demand did not survive.
Conclusion: The utilization of such credit was not permitted and the demand of duty along with interest was sustained.
Issue (ii): Whether penalty was leviable for such utilization.
Analysis: The Tribunal found that the assessee had acted under a bona fide belief regarding the availability of credit for duty payment, particularly in the context of Notification No. 12/15-CE dated 13.04.2015. In the facts of the case, this was treated as a bona fide mistake warranting relief from penalty.
Conclusion: The penalty was set aside.
Final Conclusion: The fiscal demand was upheld, but the penal consequences were removed, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Education cess and higher education cess credit earned prior to 01.03.2015 could not be utilized for payment of duty, but penalty may be waived where the incorrect utilization occurred under a bona fide mistake.