Revenue's Appeal Denied: Free Warranty Services Eligible for Cenvat Credit.

The Revenue's appeal was rejected as it lacked merits. The Commissioner relied on Tribunal decisions supporting the appellant's position on the admissibility of Cenvat credit for services provided free of cost during the warranty period. The Tribunal held that providing repair and maintenance services during the warranty period, even if free of cost, did not make the service exempted. The Revenue's argument that the decisions lacked finality in litigation was dismissed due to the absence of an appeal or stay against those decisions.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Irregular availing of Cenvat credit for spare parts and input services used in providing free repair and replacement services during warranty period.
2. Admissibility of Cenvat credit for services provided free of cost during warranty period.

Analysis:
1. The main issue in the present appeal was whether the respondent irregularly availed Cenvat credit for spare parts and input services used in providing free repair and replacement services during the warranty period. The Revenue contended that the warranty services were exempted as the customer did not pay for the taxable services. The Commissioner observed that the value of the repair and maintenance services during the warranty period was included in the initial cost of the goods sold, and Central Excise duty was paid at the time of sale. The Commissioner referred to a Tribunal decision that held the appellant correctly availed Cenvat credit on input services for taxable services during the warranty period.

2. The Commissioner also referenced another Tribunal decision in a similar case, where it was held that providing repair and maintenance services during the warranty period, even if free of cost, did not make the service exempted. The Tribunal in that case decided in favor of the assessee, stating that the appellant correctly availed Cenvat credit on input services for taxable services during the warranty period. The Revenue did not challenge the applicability of these Tribunal decisions to the case at hand but argued that the decisions had not reached finality in litigation. However, since there was no appeal filed by the Revenue against these decisions or a stay of their operation, the Commissioner's reliance on these decisions in the impugned order was deemed valid.

In conclusion, the Revenue's appeal was rejected as it lacked merits, considering the consistent Tribunal decisions supporting the appellant's position on the admissibility of Cenvat credit for services provided free of cost during the warranty period.

---