TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court Upholds Internal Rate Return Method for Income Recognition in Hire Purchase</h1> <h3>M/s. Sundaram Finance Limited. Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle VI (4) Chennai.</h3> M/s. Sundaram Finance Limited. Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Company Circle VI (4) Chennai. - [2019] 413 ITR 291 (Mad) Issues:1. Appropriate method of income recognition in hire purchase transaction - IRR vs. ESM2. Accrual of interest income under IRR method3. Entitlement to maintain Book on IRR method while offering income on ESM method for tax purposeIssue 1: Appropriate method of income recognition in hire purchase transaction - IRR vs. ESMThe Tribunal held that the Internal Rate Return (IRR) method is appropriate for income recognition in hire purchase transactions, contrary to the Equated Sum (ESM) method usually followed by the Appellant. The Tribunal emphasized that the character of the transaction as a hire purchase agreement necessitates following the treatment given under the agreement. The Madras High Court, citing a previous decision, agreed with the Tribunal's reasoning. The Court highlighted that the consistency in returning income based on EMI method, as accepted by the Revenue in previous years, did not result in income suppression. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing that the method of income recognition should align with the nature of the transaction.Issue 2: Accrual of interest income under IRR methodThe Tribunal, supported by a Central Board of Direct Taxes Circular, allowed computing interest component based on the EMI Method. The Andhra Pradesh High Court discussed the Madras High Court's view, emphasizing the importance of reflecting bifurcation of EMIs into principal and interest components in hire purchase agreements. The Court illustrated the difference between indexing and mercantile systems of accounting, highlighting the impact on interest income accrual. It was concluded that interest income recognized on the basis of the Sum of Digits (SOD) system, as per the Assessee's books, represented the 'real income' accrued. The Court upheld the Revenue's computation of income from finance charges, emphasizing adherence to the chosen accounting method.Issue 3: Entitlement to maintain Book on IRR method while offering income on ESM method for tax purposeThe Madras High Court differentiated a case where the terms of the agreement did not permit the Indexing System of accounting from the present case. It was emphasized that in the absence of a clear reflection of EMIs into principal and interest components, the Indexing system should be considered valid. The Court noted the Assessee's consistent use of the EMI method for tax purposes, despite employing the SOD method in its books. The Court relied on a previous decision to support taxability based on the EMI method. Consequently, the Assessee's appeal was allowed, affirming the use of the EMI method for tax assessment, in line with past practices.---
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
