Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether city compensatory allowance paid to an assessee posted at a particular city was exempt from tax under section 10(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The allowance was found to have been granted not with reference to the nature of the duties performed, but exclusively with reference to the place of posting and to meet the increased personal cost of living. The Explanation inserted retrospectively by the Finance Act No. 25 of 1975 clarified that an allowance paid to meet personal expenses at the place where duties are ordinarily performed is not to be treated as a special allowance incurred wholly, necessarily and exclusively in the performance of duties. On that footing, the allowance did not satisfy the statutory requirement for exemption under clause (14).
Conclusion: The city compensatory allowance was not exempt under section 10(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the question was answered in the negative, in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: An allowance granted by reason of the place of posting, to meet personal expenses arising from higher living costs, is not exempt under section 10(14) where the statutory explanation excludes allowances paid for personal expenses at the place where duties are ordinarily performed.