Hospital treatment supplies are not taxable sales, but outpatient pharmacy transactions remain taxable under Kerala VAT law.

Under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003, drugs, implants and consumables used in inpatient treatment are treated as part of a composite medical service and are not taxable as separate sales of goods. Pharmacy sales of medicines and other goods to outpatients are distinct transactions with an element of choice and are taxable; hospitals carrying on such sales must register as dealers. Oxygen, X-ray charges, laboratory chemicals and similar in-hospital diagnostic or treatment inputs are likewise not separate sales. Penalty for non-registration may survive where taxable outpatient sales exist, but penalty for non-production of books under section 67 is not justified, and time-barred notices or assessments are liable to be quashed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether drugs, implants and consumables used in the course of inpatient treatment in a hospital are sale of goods exigible to tax under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003; (ii) whether sale of medicines and other goods by a hospital pharmacy to outpatients is taxable and whether hospitals carrying on such activity are required to be registered as dealers under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003; (iii) whether oxygen, X-ray charges, laboratory chemicals and similar items used within the hospital premises in the course of treatment or diagnosis are taxable as sale of goods; and (iv) whether penalties and proceedings for non-registration or non-production of books under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 are sustainable in the circumstances of the cases.

Issue (i): Whether drugs, implants and consumables used in the course of inpatient treatment in a hospital are sale of goods exigible to tax under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

Analysis: The supply of drugs, implants and consumables to an inpatient forms part of a composite medical service. The transfer of such items cannot be severed from the therapeutic care and medical treatment rendered inside the hospital. The taxable element is excluded because the goods are used in the course of treatment and not as a separate sale transaction.

Conclusion: The supply of drugs, implants and consumables used in inpatient treatment is not taxable as sale of goods.

Issue (ii): Whether sale of medicines and other goods by a hospital pharmacy to outpatients is taxable and whether hospitals carrying on such activity are required to be registered as dealers under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

Analysis: A pharmacy sale to an outpatient is distinct from administration of medicines as part of treatment. The outpatient has the option to purchase or not to purchase the prescribed medicines, and that choice supplies the element of consensus ad idem required for a sale. Such sales are therefore ordinary sales of goods. Since hospitals supply goods in the course of their activities and may need to establish before the assessing authority which supplies are covered by the treatment exemption, registration as dealers is necessary.

Conclusion: Pharmacy sales to outpatients are taxable, and hospitals carrying on such transactions are required to be registered under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003.

Issue (iii): Whether oxygen, X-ray charges, laboratory chemicals and similar items used within the hospital premises in the course of treatment or diagnosis are taxable as sale of goods.

Analysis: Oxygen administered in treatment, X-rays taken within the hospital, and laboratory chemicals used in diagnostic procedures are part of medical or para-medical service. They do not constitute separate transfers of goods to the patient and cannot be treated as sales merely because they are reflected in the hospital bill.

Conclusion: Oxygen, X-ray charges, laboratory chemicals and similar in-hospital diagnostic or treatment inputs are not taxable as sale of goods.

Issue (iv): Whether penalties and proceedings for non-registration or non-production of books under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 are sustainable in the circumstances of the cases.

Analysis: Penalty for non-registration was sustained because hospitals were held liable to register. However, penalty under section 67 for non-production of books was not justified, as the statutory consequence of failure to comply with notice is assessment on best judgment rather than penalty. Some notices and assessments were also set aside for limitation.

Conclusion: Penalties for non-registration were sustained, penalties for non-production of books under section 67 were set aside, and time-barred notices or assessments were quashed.

Final Conclusion: The decision draws a clear distinction between in-hospital treatment, which is not a taxable sale, and pharmacy sales to outpatients, which are taxable; it also affirms the need for hospital registration while limiting punitive action where the statute does not authorise it.

Ratio Decidendi: Goods supplied as an inseparable part of inpatient medical treatment are not sales, but a hospital pharmacy sale to an outpatient is a distinct taxable transaction; hospitals engaged in such supplies must be registered to establish the treatment-based exemption for in-hospital transfers.

---