Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revision of assessment under Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 could be sustained when the assessee was not afforded personal hearing and the objections to the pre-revision notice were not considered by a reasoned order.
Analysis: The assessee had filed a detailed reply to the pre-revision notice and specifically sought personal hearing. The impugned order acknowledged receipt of the objections, but it rejected them in a brief manner without addressing the objections on merits. The Court noted that a personal hearing is mandatory in assessment revision proceedings and that denial of such opportunity vitiates the order as it offends natural justice.
Conclusion: The reassessment order was held to be unsustainable for want of personal hearing and proper consideration of objections, and the matter was remanded for fresh decision after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.