Typographical errors apparent on the record can be rectified without revisiting the merits of the order

Clerical and typographical errors in a final order, including incorrect statutory references, wrong clause and section numbers, and erroneous paragraph numbering, may be corrected when they are apparent from the record and do not require reappreciation of the merits. On that basis, the tribunal treated the mistakes as rectifiable errors and allowed correction of the order.

---

---

Issues: Whether the errors pointed out in the final order were mere typographical mistakes apparent on the record and liable to be rectified.

Analysis: The recorded mistakes related to incorrect statutory references, wrong clause and section numbers, and erroneous paragraph numbering. On perusal of the record and the earlier order, the mistakes were found to be clerical and typographical in nature, with the correct references being capable of straightforward correction. Since the errors were apparent from the face of the record and did not require any reappreciation of the merits, rectification was warranted.

Conclusion: The mistakes were held to be typographical and were directed to be corrected, and the application for rectification was allowed.

---