Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled, before finalisation of the revision proceedings, to be furnished with the records relied on by the department, to have summons issued to the third parties said to have sold the goods, to cross-examine those third parties, and to be given a personal hearing.
Analysis: The dispute concerned alleged purchases said to have been made during the period when the assessee's mother was carrying on the business, and the assessee asserted that he had no access to the old records and did not know the alleged sellers. The Court noted that the prayer was limited to enabling verification of the materials relied on by the department and to testing their truth through examination of the relevant third parties. Referring to the statutory power to summon and examine persons and compel production of documents, the Court held that no prejudice would be caused to the department by granting such an opportunity and that a fair inquiry required disclosure of the materials and the chance to test them.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the records, summons to the third parties, cross-examination, a detailed inquiry, filing of final objections, and a personal hearing before the final order was passed.