Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amounts shown as provision for taxation and proposed dividend could be treated as reserves for computing capital under rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963.
Analysis: The character of the amounts depended upon the facts shown by the balance-sheet and surrounding circumstances. A provision for taxation could be treated as a reserve only to the extent it exceeded tax liability that had already accrued by the relevant date. Likewise, the proposed dividend amount could be treated as a reserve only after examining how the assessee had dealt with dividend declaration and whether the amount had been earmarked for an existing liability or only for a future contingency. As the necessary findings on these factual matters were absent, the legal question could not be finally answered on the material then available.
Conclusion: The reference was sent back to the Tribunal for fresh decision after recording appropriate findings on the relevant factual issues.