Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment under Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 could be sustained against a purchaser who had reported the purchases and produced invoices, when the seller had not reported the corresponding sales.
Analysis: The purchase transactions and the supporting invoices were not disputed. The recorded reasoning applies the principle that, where the seller fails to disclose the sales or remit the tax, action lies against the defaulting seller and not against the bona fide purchaser who has claimed input tax credit on the basis of the seller's invoice. The impugned reassessment was therefore found unsustainable on the facts, and the matter was directed to be reconsidered after affording opportunity of personal hearing.
Conclusion: The reassessment order could not be sustained against the purchaser on the basis of the seller's default, and the writ petition succeeded to the extent of quashing the order and remitting the matter for fresh consideration.