Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the empty containers in which the imported machinery was packed were liable to confiscation on the ground of non-declaration or suppression of value, and whether there was any violation of Section 46(4) of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: The import documents described the machinery as duly packed in containers, and the supplier's certificate stated that the invoice value included the cost of the containers. On this factual basis, the declaration in the bill of entry could not be treated as false or incomplete, and there was no material to support an allegation that the container value had been suppressed. The transaction was for import of machinery packed in containers, and the containers formed part of the declared supply. The settled principle applied was that where containers are part of the imported consignment and their value is included in the import price, separate duty demand or confiscation cannot be sustained in the absence of misdeclaration.
Conclusion: The allegation of misdeclaration and suppression was not established, and confiscation of the containers, together with redemption fine and penalty, was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where imported goods are declared as packed in containers and the evidence shows that the invoice value includes the cost of those containers, the containers cannot be treated as separately undeclared goods liable to confiscation in the absence of misdeclaration or suppression.