Court stresses adherence to audit terms, grants liberty to resolve issues, directs strict compliance with 31.12.2018 order The court reiterated the importance of following modified terms of reference under Section 142(2A) for special audits and clarified the commencement ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court stresses adherence to audit terms, grants liberty to resolve issues, directs strict compliance with 31.12.2018 order
The court reiterated the importance of following modified terms of reference under Section 142(2A) for special audits and clarified the commencement sequence for audits from 1.4.2018 onwards. Emphasizing the need to avoid simultaneous audits for all years to prevent difficulties, the court granted parties the liberty to approach the court for unresolved issues. The Assessing Officer and Special Auditor were directed to consider overlapping issues and the petitioner/assessee was allowed to consult them based on previous orders. The Special Auditor was instructed to strictly adhere to the terms of reference outlined in the order dated 31.12.2018, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.
Issues: 1. Special audit orders for Assessment Years 2015-16 and subsequent years. 2. Compliance with modified terms of reference under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. Clarification on the commencement of special audits and resolution of issues arising in different years.
Analysis: 1. The petitioner sought orders similar to those issued for special audits in previous years. The court had previously directed that modified terms of reference under Section 142(2A) must be followed. The Assessing Officer's order dated 31.12.2018 indicated the modified terms of reference. The court reiterated the acceptance of modified terms of reference for special audits and clarified the commencement sequence for audits from 1.4.2018 onwards. The court emphasized the importance of avoiding simultaneous audits for all years to prevent difficulties and overlapping issues. The parties were given the liberty to approach the court if any issues remained unresolved.
2. The court reiterated that simultaneous special audits for all years could lead to difficulties and overlapping issues. The Assessing Officer and Special Auditor were directed to consider these aspects. The petitioner/assessee was granted the liberty to consult the AO and the special auditor based on previous audit and assessment orders. If necessary, the parties could seek resolution through court intervention for any incidental issues arising.
3. The Special Auditor was instructed to strictly adhere to the terms of reference outlined in the order dated 31.12.2018 while conducting the audit. The writ petition and application were disposed of in accordance with the above terms, ensuring compliance with modified terms of reference and addressing the commencement and resolution of issues in different assessment years.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.