TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether traction batteries specifically designed for electrically operated material handling equipment were eligible for concessional purchase against Form XVII under Section 3(5) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. (ii) Whether penalty under Section 16(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was sustainable when the reassessment arose out of a dispute regarding exemption and the applicable rate of tax.
Issue (i): Whether traction batteries specifically designed for electrically operated material handling equipment were eligible for concessional purchase against Form XVII under Section 3(5) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Analysis: The relevant schedule to Section 3(5) extended concession to machinery worked by electricity and to parts and accessories of such machinery and tools used with the machinery. The product in question was traction batteries specially designed for electrically operated material handling equipment and vehicles. On that basis, the batteries were treated as forming part of the equipment for the purpose of the concessional purchase scheme.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether penalty under Section 16(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was sustainable when the reassessment arose out of a dispute regarding exemption and the applicable rate of tax.
Analysis: The reassessment proceeded under Section 16(1)(b) in a context where there was a genuine dispute about the correctness of the exemption claim and the applicable rate of tax. In the absence of escapement of turnover, the factual basis for penalty was not made out.
Conclusion: The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The revision failed and the Tribunal's view on concessional eligibility and deletion of penalty was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are specially designed to suit electrically operated machinery and are covered by the statutory concession for machinery and its parts and accessories, concessional purchase cannot be denied; penalty cannot be levied when reassessment is founded on a bona fide dispute and no escapement of turnover is established.
TaxTMI 
